TomT said:
... simply need to mentally multiply that number by your displayed M/Kwh to get your remaining range in miles... .
It's not going to work well with the current data. It doesn't add up.
I've said this several times now, but I don't want people seeing 281 Gids, then multiplying by 80, getting 22.5kWh, then multiplying by the dash or console miles/kWh (let's say 4.8), and thinking they'll drive 108 miles. With a 70F battery, we already know that distance will be closer to 100.
That is why the previous discussions were centered around 70 and 75 watt hours per Gid. That data more accurately reflects distance traveled from Gid count.
There is a significant difference in this 80 value per Gid, and what we can actually use. We do not have Gid data at exceptionally low temps to see if it does adjust for temp. I believe it will do so for degradation.