TimLee
Well-known member
Still two earther entries. One with delivered Leaf on 04-22-2011, other shows cancelled status.
TimLee said:Still two earther entries. One with delivered Leaf on 04-22-2011, other shows cancelled status.
But it was a single reservation, a single initial order of an SV, and then a revision of the order to an SL with QC once EV Project expanded to your area and you were accepted. Shouldn't that be a single spreadsheet entry, with those details or the earlier SV and its VIN in the notes / comments instead of two entries? Seems like Canceled should be actual cancellation of Leaf purchase?earther said:not really an error. (the notes/comments section of the spreadsheet explains the apparent discrepancy. in short: i was yet another "victim" of the late admit EVProject bug)TimLee said:Still two earther entries. One with delivered Leaf on 04-22-2011, other shows cancelled status.
leafkabob said:Just updated my entry. Got VIN 2530 this morning, with a new estimated delivery date of 5/30/11. Much better than "July" and no VIN.
BlueSL said:2. It looks like Nissan is moving heaven and earth to deliver Leafs to the Forgotten September orderers before it delivers to January and February orderers.
For the moment, color code them as erroneous and put them at the end (last rows) of the spreadheet. If the errors are so bad as to make the entire entry useless, and there have been no updates to it in the last 3? months, then delete it.drees said:turbo has been gracious enough to give me access to the sheet along with detailed instructions, so I will also be assisting with keeping things updated as I have time.
I do agree that some of the bad entries should be cleaned up: Robertwray and mckemie for example which contains clearly erroneous data - how should we deal with them?
If there is clearly incorrect data such as missing or bad order date and there is no update in the last 30 days.... I say delete the entry.drees said:turbo has been gracious enough to give me access to the sheet along with detailed instructions, so I will also be assisting with keeping things updated as I have time.
I do agree that some of the bad entries should be cleaned up: Robertwray and mckemie for example which contains clearly erroneous data - how should we deal with them?
Enter your email address to join: