nerys said:Because it is wrong. Very plainly and obviously wrong.
That is like sayong a coipon is a seperate thing so you dont get to count the savings from the co I pon on the ham you bought because it was not 100% the value of the ham.
I don't know what kind of system you have but I would expect you have a standard grid tie system so it seems like maybe the issue is that you don't realize that your PV system is actually providing power to be used by ANY of your electrical demands, not just an EV. You seem to think that if you sold your electric car that your solar PV would stop saving you money because you "bought it "for" the electric car.". The reality is that it will keep saving you money regardless of if you own an electric car. In fact the amount of money you are saving from installing PV has nothing to do with owning an electric car!nerys said:No electric car. No solar. I bought it "for" the electric car.
Because it was my scenario and I can "decree" whatever I wanted to help show you by example so I "decreed" AC costs going down, since in that scenario you didn't have an EV. If you sit back and look at this from a simple math point of view your AC or your EV costs are not going down, but your utility bill is going down by installing PV.nerys said:Why is it that you can "decree" that my air conditiong cost goes down?
Exactly, and installing PV makes X dollars go into you pocket. Buying an EV makes Y dollars go into your pocket and doing both makes X+Y go into your pocket.nerys said:The "relationship" is the dollar in or out of my pocket. It really is that simple.
nerys said:I think you need to read better. Or did you miss the $8700 $800 $400 $500 and $100 figures in my post?
I am very honestly still not sure what the heck your arguing for exactly. I kniw what your arguing but not what your intentions are
How about spelling them out for me?
nerys said:I am very honestly still not sure what the heck your arguing for exactly. I kniw what your arguing but not what your intentions are
How about spelling them out for me?
I was trying to explain why I am having such a hard time reading what you write. I to am using a cell phone but I take the time to proof read my posts to help ensure that they make sense.nerys said:I am typing from a cell phone. My typos are not relevant. Your are trolling by complaining about them since it is a fact that the human mind can extract a tremendous amount of info from "gibberish"
You are choosing to complain about that which is so minor as to be nearly indistinguishable from completely irrelevant.
I have already given you the numbers. You refuse to read them for some reason?
Who said anything about roi? Sure as heck not me.
I did not pay anyone. No one sold me anything. I installed it myself with used panels as funds permit.
nerys said:I am typing from a cell phone. My typos are not relevant. Your are trolling by complaining about them since it is a fact that the human mind can extract a tremendous amount of info from "gibberish"
You are choosing to complain about that which is so minor as to be nearly indistinguishable from completely irrelevant.
nerys said:your inability to understand English is not my problem
your questions were explicitly answered I will not answer them again
and who the hell said anything about free my array cost me about a thousand dollars (built it piece by piece) its been 3 years so $1200 saved roi is 0 since it has already paid for itself.
That must not be true though if you paid someone $1,000.nerys said:I did not pay anyone. No one sold me anything.
LeftieBiker said:In Hell, the demons now issue all orders to the Damned via portable devices. They type very quickly, and leave auto-correct off. If the Damned can't understand the commands, they are tortured. Reading the above exchanges is a little bit like being in Hell for anyone who grew up before 1997.
LOl!!!!!!!1 ;-)QueenBee said:LeftieBiker said:In Hell, the demons now issue all orders to the Damned via portable devices. They type very quickly, and leave auto-correct off. If the Damned can't understand the commands, they are tortured. Reading the above exchanges is a little bit like being in Hell for anyone who grew up before 1997.
It's like hell for someone who was still growing up in 1997 as well.
nerys said:again your lack of understanding of English is not my problem there is a difference between being sold something as in a salesman selling you on something and buying something which of course someone sold to you but is not the same thing as being "sold" something. Context. Learn that word. It is really handy.
nerys said:I did not pay anyone. No one sold me anything.
Unfortunately that isn't true. The ROI of something doesn't change just because the investment has been returned. The ROI was still ~3 years but since it has been three years your investment has returned. Maybe reading this will help clear things up: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/returnoninvestment.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; You'll notice in their formula they do not include a value for how much has been returned already since that has no relaventcy.nerys said:once something has paid for itself its ROI break even point is now in the past that means it is 0 now.
nerys said:Roi is your problem. Your the only one who initiated discussion about it or is concerned about
I have one and only one concern over roi. Will it be positive in the projected lifespan of the purchase period. Ie time to roi break even. Any other roi discussion is of no relevance to me as I am an individual not a profit seeking corporation. Ie amount of roi means nothing to me.
I will entertain no other avenue of roi discussion and will summarilly ignore any more about it
Enter your email address to join: