doghouseReilly
New member
Hi everyone,
I've done a lot of research and am ready to purchase a 2013 Leaf. I'm stuck on one thing though. Of the two options available, one has the QC port but has an extra 9K miles on it. I know that the batteries degrade with use so the lower the mileage the better, but I can't decide if it's worth sacrificing the QC port in favour of lower mileage. The cost is $800 difference between the two.
There are two options available locally:
- SV trim with QC port and 25K on it
-S no QC port and 16K on it.
We will primarily charge at home, but I can see the occasional "in the field" charging, in which case the faster capability of the 6.6 might be nice. I'm not too concerned about the other trim features that the SV brings.
What would you do? higher mileage w/ QC (+$800) or lower mileage without?
Thanks for the help.
I've done a lot of research and am ready to purchase a 2013 Leaf. I'm stuck on one thing though. Of the two options available, one has the QC port but has an extra 9K miles on it. I know that the batteries degrade with use so the lower the mileage the better, but I can't decide if it's worth sacrificing the QC port in favour of lower mileage. The cost is $800 difference between the two.
There are two options available locally:
- SV trim with QC port and 25K on it
-S no QC port and 16K on it.
We will primarily charge at home, but I can see the occasional "in the field" charging, in which case the faster capability of the 6.6 might be nice. I'm not too concerned about the other trim features that the SV brings.
What would you do? higher mileage w/ QC (+$800) or lower mileage without?
Thanks for the help.