jspearman
Well-known member
surfingslovak said:Tony, let me quote something straight from the horse's mouth:TonyWilliams said:To my knowledge, nobody has had to buy a module.... yet. Since I fully expect a "Citizens, all is well" from Nissan regarding capacity loss, and since I suspect the battery degrades all cells somewhat uniformly, the cheapest way to get back your range won't be buying up to 48 of the $600 modules (that are going to degrade exactly the same way as the ones you have).
They had to replace a bunch of battery cells. It took 16 days, parts had to be ordered, a specialist had to drive up from Los Angeles to do the repairs, yadda, yadda. It was expensive (I didn’t have to pay) – about $2600, plus a rental car $550.
So it's possible, although these were likely not retail customer prices. Be it as it may, I agree with your recommendation, and I would urge anyone who owned a Leaf outright to see if it could be traded in for a 2012 lease. I know couple of people that have done just that in recent weeks, and this is the prudent thing to do. I wouldn't wait for the uncertain outcome of lemon law buybacks or some litigation. If you like the Leaf and would like to keep driving it, see if there was dealer that would let you trade in for a 2012. I would have a hard look especially at the 24-month lease deals, since battery degradation likely won't have much impact, with the exception of the hotter climates.
I wrote Trudy Varin at Avondale Nissan earlier this week and asked if I could trade our car in for a lease. I asked if they would stand behind the car, since it appeared their parent company was not taking responsibility. So far, no response, but then I have no idea what Nissan corporate is now telling Phoenix dealers, in light of the statement that they may pull all the cars.
Someone should go to a Phoenix dealer and act like they are trying to buy one, maybe mentioning they heard about the possible problems with the batteries. I'd be curious to hear the reaction from their Leaf specialists.