Tesla invested in their own charging network, something that gave them a "leg up" for long distance use. Their cars were more expensive, and more than double the price of a Leaf when they came out. That was partly what allowed them to finance the charging network.Whether you like Elon Musk or not, Tesla understood the necessity for convenient, reliable charging a dozen years ago. Other manufacturers only got religion in the past year. It will take a few years for any EV, other than Tesla, to use any L3 charger as Tesla will have to upgrade many of their Superchargers to allow CCS charging, even with adapters. Meanwhile, Superchargers have turned into a lucrative business for Tesla.
If we replace the Tesla, it may not be a Tesla, but it certainly won't be a Nissan.
Leaf was conceived as a local car, Tesla was not. Two vastly differing uses and designs with the price point to boot.
Leaf doesn't have active cooling for the battery, and as such, doesn't make it ideal for fast discharge and recharge regimes that long trips require.
I compare this to the trucks I owned. I could use my semi as my "personal car" but at around 5 MPG that doesn't make sense. I could use my 1942 K-7 to tow a semi (they did "back in the day") but 35 MPH would get old real quick (esp on a run between Iowa and Montana).
The point is to use an item the way and what it was designed to do. Yeah, a Leaf can make an occasional road trip, but that is not where it does best.
Forcing to do what it was not designed for, will give less then satisfactory result.