evchels said:
continued...
Physical meetings will be infrequent given the global nature of the group- maybe once a year, a few conference calls between, and maybe an online (private) space for ongoing discussion. I expect and hope that the regions (esp US) will convene more frequently on an individual basis, though again more likely virtually than physically.>>>
Communication- I'm aiming for balance here. There's no expectation that anyone promote Nissan or this effort as part of being in the group, or stay silent about your opinions. While it's impossible to guarantee what all we'll accomplish, this is not merely a PR stunt. At the same time, I want to facilitate as much genuine dialogue between Nissan and the group as possible, and that may involve NDA's or similar "cone of silence" agreements around the actual meetings or proprietary information. This type of distinction has worked well for other similar efforts I've seen and been a part of, so I'm hopeful that we can create a framework that's credible and comfortable to both sides.
>>>>>>
chelsea
Since you are meeting physically so seldom, I encourage you to consider arranging group Skype or other forms of video conferencing. There are quite a few sites around the world where high-quality video conferencing is available, it you have the budget for that.
What kind of outputs to you envision from this panel? A series of position papers, authored by one or more members and reviewed by the full panel ? Would you have some outputs public and others for Nissan only ? Given NDAs, could you consider "declassified" summaries that are made public to reassure us that are concerns are being listened to by Nissan people in engineering and product planning, not just PR and marketing ?
One overall theme I would suggest is an attempt to get Nissan to truly think differently about handling the LEAF customer vs conventional car customers. For example, I feel an electric car should have periodic firmware updates that
add features, not just correct errors. The customer would pay a nominal fee, much like Apple sells annual updates to its products. The fact that Palmer was "shocked" that anyone would want to buy a replacement battery shows how much movement in corporate attitude is needed.
Another area where the electric car needs to be treated differently is greater support from Nissan for public infrastructure, including both L2 and QC. Both L2 and L3 are woefully behind in Southern California, and to fix this I believe Nissan has to go beyond the "we just sell cars" mentality. In this area Nissan could be reviewing best practices, including what that other EV company, Tesla, is doing, or at least hopes to do, in installing a viable QC network.