DANandNAN
Well-known member
:? um, okdavewill said:P.S. I'm glad you like your PHEV.
:? um, okdavewill said:P.S. I'm glad you like your PHEV.
TomT said:Assuming an equal level of availability, which is a big if, I suspect the PIP will sell best because it is cheaper than the Volt and has more usable space, even though it's EV-only range is pitiful and it is clearly less sophisticated. I think the Volt will be second because many are not yet ready to give up the comfort factor of having an ICE on-board and thus will shun pure EVs...
If the Volt were available in a Prius PHEV, or much better yet, V form-factor, it would easily be our next second car... I'm not sure we'll be able to wait for the Ford C-Max Energi, plus, the pre-production versions I have seen have left me cold...
Yes, and we have some Volts that make it 57 miles and there are some Leafs that make it 105-110 miles. Their commute is not the norm and neither is yours. But, yes the PiP 6-10 mile "EV" range (and even the occasional 15 mile) works for some people and I've never denied it. But, that's a pretty small number of people and Toyota knows that. Toyota didn't put any technological innovations into the PiP - they added a charge port so you can start off fully charged. They could have, no should have done more. If they want to be the leader you claim they are, then they should lead. They're not. The PiP and other PiP variants indicate that the manufacturers were caught blindsided by the success of EV and quickly through something together. Toyota's borrowing from Tesla, Ford & Toyota are sharing info, and only Ford will bring an EV to the market this year.mitch672 said:DANandNAN, for some, the PiP works just fine, as I've stated, 1 way commute is 15 miles, because its always stop and go traffic, I make it most days in EV (so much for your 6-11 mile quoted EV range, we have some PiPs making it over 20 miles/charge in-city driving), I charge at work and 2/3 or more of the trip home is in EV as well. I don't think burning gas is "evil", I am using much less than my last 2010 Prius, going 3-4 weeks on 8-9 gallons is fine, as that used to be a weekly fillup. Not everyone needs the range of a Volt, it all depends on your drive cycle and recharge opportunities, when the EV range is exceeded, 52mpg+ even better than my last Prius, as it will be for vast numbers of people.
The key is using less gasoline, not eliminating it completely, most Americans are not ready to take that step - yet, as battery technology, weight and cost all improve, eventually BEV's will be more affordable, and with better range, will be the next logical step for many driving PHEVs, but that is still years away right now.
I'm only going to be convinced once you've got long trips under your belt in CS mode (same for scottf's post you quoted). I have no idea if you had a tailwind, net elevation loss, etc. on that drive.DANandNAN said:I'm not stretching anything. The government stats are very low and CR is generally wrong. We get 45MPG in CS mode. There was one time when we needed it for .2 miles and the generator reved up and created a charge that we never used before shutting off and recharging - that charge is lost and the MPG was really low, somewhere around 34MPG. But, on our longer trips (more than .2 miles ) we get 45MPG. City is a bit less, but yes, that's our average. And, we drive it like our ICE cars, using AC on ECO mode on almost every drive.cwerdna said:It seems that you're stretching the truth on the Volt's CS mileage. It was either you or someone else who did that before here on MNL. What speeds are you talking about?DANandNAN said:GM set the bar, 40+ miles in pure EV then a range extending generator that's getting ~45MPG.
Per http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=31618" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;, EPA rating on the Volt in CS mode in 35 city/40 highway, 37 mpg combined.
In CR's testing (their highway almost always exceeds EPA highway #), they got 23 city/41 highway (see http://news.consumerreports.org/cars/2011/10/update-chevrolet-volt-sees-fuel-economy-increase.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false. From http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/chevrolet/volt/road-test.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (you'll need a subscription):
The 1.4-liter four-cylinder gas engine starts and stops smoothly but runs on premium fuel. With it running, the Volt returned a very good 32 mpg overall and 41 mpg on the highway...
Come on, you know the government stats were crazy, look at the 100 mile range for the Leaf v. how many folks achieve it. I think the testers decided to err on the side of caution after the 100 mile range debacle.
First off, Toyota doesn't seem to be too focused on EVs and making them a priority, right or wrong. At least, that's been the company line for a long time. I wish I could find other quotes from their execs besides http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/11/toyota%E2%80%99s-prius-chief-engineer-reveals-the-future-of-the-automobile-part-two-what-will-we-drive-in-10-years/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. (It'll take some digging).DANandNAN said:Toyota didn't put any technological innovations into the PiP - they added a charge port so you can start off fully charged. They could have, no should have done more. If they want to be the leader you claim they are, then they should lead. They're not. The PiP and other PiP variants indicate that the manufacturers were caught blindsided by the success of EV and quickly through something together. Toyota's borrowing from Tesla, Ford & Toyota are sharing info, and only Ford will bring an EV to the market this year.
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Nissan, GM and now Ford will all have EV's (RLBEV & EREV) and Toyota's entry still burns gas if you accelerate too hard or drive too fast?
We can't stop the use of gasoline. The key is innovative vehicles that aren't full of compromises - now go tell Toyota.
I think you overestimate how much I care about whether you believe me. I showed you a picture from someone else that's achieved better than we did, it's not enough. I really don't care - sorry (not really).cwerdna said:I'm only going to be convinced once you've got long trips under your belt in CS mode (same for scottf's post you quoted). I have no idea if you had a tailwind, net elevation loss, etc. on that drive.
As for CR's results, yes, their city numbers are quite low for ALL vehicles (see last page of http://www.consumersunion.org/Oct_CR_Fuel_Economy.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; for their procedure vs. old EPA tests). Their highway numbers are actually reasonable. Gen 3 Prius figures are at http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/most-fuel-efficient-cars.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and Gen 2 at http://web.archive.org/web/20071228171729/http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/new-cars/buying-advice/most-fuelefficient-cars-206/index.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. Their overall figures are a tiny bit low due to the low city #.
My lifetime avg on my 06 Prius is ~45 to 46 mpg. What's the EPA combined mileage (after adjustment by formula)? 46 mpg. What's CR overall #? 44 mpg.
I still call your claims about Volt CS MPG exaggerations, just like your PiP misinformation.
BTW, to learn more about the EPA tests, read http://priuschat.com/forums/other-cars/67235-car-driver-truth-about-epa-city-highway-mpg-estimates.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;.
I have to run, but the fact that Toyota had a PiP in 2009, saw what Nissan and GM and now Ford have done and they STILL didn't change anything speaks volumes. They had 2 years to make changes yet 6-10 miles (I know, you get 15) and an engine that starts at the drop of a hat is the best they can do? Come on, you know that's a terrible, terrible first effort. And I was pulling for Toyota and Honda (another HUGE disappointment). I'm not a brand zealot, I'm willing to switch at any time. The PiP is a huge letdown.cwerdna said:First off, Toyota doesn't seem to be too focused on EVs and making them a priority, right or wrong. At least, that's been the company line for a long time. I wish I could find other quotes from their execs besides http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2011/11/toyota%E2%80%99s-prius-chief-engineer-reveals-the-future-of-the-automobile-part-two-what-will-we-drive-in-10-years/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;. (It'll take some digging).DANandNAN said:Toyota didn't put any technological innovations into the PiP - they added a charge port so you can start off fully charged. They could have, no should have done more. If they want to be the leader you claim they are, then they should lead. They're not. The PiP and other PiP variants indicate that the manufacturers were caught blindsided by the success of EV and quickly through something together. Toyota's borrowing from Tesla, Ford & Toyota are sharing info, and only Ford will bring an EV to the market this year.
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Nissan, GM and now Ford will all have EV's (RLBEV & EREV) and Toyota's entry still burns gas if you accelerate too hard or drive too fast?
We can't stop the use of gasoline. The key is innovative vehicles that aren't full of compromises - now go tell Toyota.
It seems pretty clear the upcoming RAV4 EV is a CA compliance vehicle.
Toyota had introduced the PHV Prius demonstrators in late 2009 (http://green.autoblog.com/2009/11/20/toyota-starts-discussions-on-who-will-get-phev-priuses/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false. Some lucky folks (such as the Priuschat founder, Danny) got to drive the demonstrators pretty early in 2010 (http://www.toyota.com/upcoming-vehicles/prius-plug-in/test-drives.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false.
As for "Toyota didn't put any technological innovations into the PiP - they added a charge port so you can start off fully charged." That's a mischaracterization. They went from a small NiMH battery to a much larger li-ion, added a J1772 port and had to add more cooling. http://priuschat.com/news/2012-toyota-prius-plug-in-15-mile-ev-range-87-mpge-32000" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (mainly under Packaging and Weight Optimization) mentions some other stuff they had to do on the PiP. But, they didn't need to change much else. The 3rd gen Prius already was suitable as a base.
In the brief time the PiP's been out, its CYTD US sales have already passed the Leaf's CYTD sales (http://www.hybridcars.com/news/april-2012-dashboard-45388.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false.
Few? http://priuschat.com/forums/toyota-prius-plug-in/poll-1102-what-your-full-ev-range-startup-without-fan.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;DANandNAN said:The PiP reports from owners say 6-10 miles with a few that get better. I've never seen anyone get 20 but I'm not calling Mitch a liar.
Because they're quoting the EPA numbers? Those look like it to me. 6 miles before the engine comes on and blended EV miles is 11.
The test isn't setup for the PHV because after 6 miles, the test requires a hard acceleration. That's not a problem with the Volt because it's designed to keep the engine off until the battery is in C-S mode. The PHV was designed to be the most efficient vehicle in all possible scenarios and I guess Toyota engineers decided that petrol is a better use of energy than electrons for hard acceleration (rather than draining the battery and running in HV mode).
This is why the PHV gets 50mpg combined in gas mode vs 37 or whatever the number is for the Volt.
This may sound daft but what's an RLBEV?davewill said:By the way, did you invent this "RL"BEV term just to annoy folks? It's a BEV, period.
I guess you don't understand typical car design, engineering and production time spans. What has Ford done? How many PHEVs and BEVs have they sold?DANandNAN said:I have to run, but the fact that Toyota had a PiP in 2009, saw what Nissan and GM and now Ford have done and they STILL didn't change anything speaks volumes. They had 2 years to make changes yet 6-10 miles (I know, you get 15) and an engine that starts at the drop of a hat is the best they can do? Come on, you know that's a terrible, terrible first effort. And I was pulling for Toyota and Honda (another HUGE disappointment). I'm not a brand zealot, I'm willing to switch at any time. The PiP is a huge letdown.
And, yes, the PiP has already posted some impressive numbers. But, as was said on another thread/forum (IIRC it was by you?) the numbers probably won't be sustained once the HOV folks get their stickers back.
DANandNAN said:...Toyota didn't put any technological innovations into the PiP
Doesn't it seem odd to you that Nissan, GM and now Ford will all have EV's (RLBEV & EREV) and Toyota's entry still burns gas if you accelerate too hard or drive too fast?
eHelmholtz said:This may sound daft but what's an RLBEV?davewill said:By the way, did you invent this "RL"BEV term just to annoy folks? It's a BEV, period.
The Volt is my first Chevrolet. You've seen Toyota reps quotes in the the article on the Prius sold in CA. CA carries the Prius. EV1s were a good test but $250K ... Toyota RAV4 EV was a good test too for Toyota right?. Back now for US$49,800. Yes Toyota is impressive. Nice method to ignore the awards and their meaning. Clearly all those awards and professionals behinds them understand the system is revolutionary and unique. Besides the car is more enjoyable to drive and own and this from previous and current Prius owners so seems like you'd believe that ... never mind.mitch672 said:Scott, I'm not in CA, and we don't have any HOV lane access in MA. Sure, the PiP is attractive to CA HOV buyers, I guess it was important enough to GM as well, as they got a similar boost in sales when the Volts emissions system qualified it for HOV access as well.
The Prius has won awards as well, we just don't feel the need to post links to them.
Prius buyers know Toyota will be there, and stand behind their products, GM has already shown their true colors, as they abandon buyers of their products from the "old GM" (you know, the one that went bankrupt and the taxpayers had to bail out).
face it, Toyota doesn't have to have the latest and greatest, being conservative and careful planning has worked well for them, and will continue to, as buyers are confident in the brand, unlike certain other Johnny come lately mfrs.
Enter your email address to join: