Let me explain e-pedal in a simple way from my engineering perspective.
When you accelerate your car, you transform the "electric" energy from your battery into kinetic energy, energy of inertia at certain speed and this process isn't 100% efficient. This energy can be dissipated as tire and other friction losses and air drag so with no intentional deceleration (braking) you reach maximum possible distance. So with accelerating and then coasting, you travel the furthest. But roads are not straight lines so sometimes you need to decelerate. That is when a part of kinetic energy goes back to battery. Since this process also isn't 100% efficient, you get back less then you put in. E-pedal only translates one pedal to both, accelerator and brakes. Every time you release the pedal a bit it starts breaking and you loose a part of energy. So if your foot is restless then it's almost no coasting, always accelerating and braking and always loosing some energy.
Coasting is most energy efficient, if you have conditions that allows you to coast. If you need to press the brake, it regenerates anyway but only when you really want to decelerate. I use it when I can.
In ECO mode motor and inverter don't get any more efficient, it is just that the behavior (usually response) of the pedal is changed, usually it is more sluggish. But that works, because accelerating to certain speed slowly is more energy efficient then accelerating quickly. This is simply due to electrical losses not being linear to electrical current but squared. So for example if you accelerate from 0 to 60mph in 5 seconds you will loose 4x more energy to heat then if you do it in 10 seconds. Of course there are other factors involved, but I wanted to keep it simple.
I hope this clarifies why it is almost impossible for e-pedal to be as efficient as coasting.
English isn't my native language so I'm sorry for possible mistakes.
When you accelerate your car, you transform the "electric" energy from your battery into kinetic energy, energy of inertia at certain speed and this process isn't 100% efficient. This energy can be dissipated as tire and other friction losses and air drag so with no intentional deceleration (braking) you reach maximum possible distance. So with accelerating and then coasting, you travel the furthest. But roads are not straight lines so sometimes you need to decelerate. That is when a part of kinetic energy goes back to battery. Since this process also isn't 100% efficient, you get back less then you put in. E-pedal only translates one pedal to both, accelerator and brakes. Every time you release the pedal a bit it starts breaking and you loose a part of energy. So if your foot is restless then it's almost no coasting, always accelerating and braking and always loosing some energy.
Coasting is most energy efficient, if you have conditions that allows you to coast. If you need to press the brake, it regenerates anyway but only when you really want to decelerate. I use it when I can.
In ECO mode motor and inverter don't get any more efficient, it is just that the behavior (usually response) of the pedal is changed, usually it is more sluggish. But that works, because accelerating to certain speed slowly is more energy efficient then accelerating quickly. This is simply due to electrical losses not being linear to electrical current but squared. So for example if you accelerate from 0 to 60mph in 5 seconds you will loose 4x more energy to heat then if you do it in 10 seconds. Of course there are other factors involved, but I wanted to keep it simple.
I hope this clarifies why it is almost impossible for e-pedal to be as efficient as coasting.
English isn't my native language so I'm sorry for possible mistakes.