Oh wow. Yes, please if the owner of VIN #00493 (2011) wants to fill us on the details (replaced under warranty?), that'd be awesome. 110,000 miles with 60.82 amp hours. Impressive.tomw wrote:Looks like VIN #00493 has a newer battery pack as well?
Oh wow. Yes, please if the owner of VIN #00493 (2011) wants to fill us on the details (replaced under warranty?), that'd be awesome. 110,000 miles with 60.82 amp hours. Impressive.tomw wrote:Looks like VIN #00493 has a newer battery pack as well?
I think 67 aHr should be the baseline for 2011s and 2012s, but the site is still showing 62 aHr.kirkhilles wrote:Thanks for the input. Honestly, I'm not sure if there are any definite values for each year (be sure to let me know if you find any), so I just searched around and came up with those. I've adjusted the values to 67 as that also matches the value for the 2012 owner that looks like he's gotten a new battery.
Maybe combine that with the ability to click on a specific VIN to see it daily (either the entire list, or just for the clicked month).jlv wrote: Another suggestion: in the "Amp Hours over Time" you might want to filter the data to be just by month. The output is getting really long!
Thanks for the heads up! I'll need to let the developer of Leaf Spy know as there's no differentiation for F vs C.Superchewie wrote:Just checking in... I'm lucky vehicle #13 in the database!
I'm seeing a possible data confusion issue in the Avg Battery Temperature field... my temp data is recorded in Celsius, whereas the majority of the other vehicles appear to be using Fahrenheit. My pack temp is going to look ridiculously low in the long run!
kirkhilles wrote:I see that VIN #18515 which is a 2012 had a huge battery jump. New Battery? If you're reading this, would you mind giving me/us details? Was it still under warranty? If not, did you get a discount? I'm still waiting for my 2012 to drop its final bar (VIN #22214) which I'm totally jealous as I've had less than you did while I still was out of warranty (I'm about 2 weeks past that now, sigh).
Thanks! I've updated it.Chadrph wrote:I added my 2016 SL yesterday. It appears the Amp HR will need to be updated to reflect the 30KWH battery pack in the 16 SL.
2011-12's ahr was in the mid 66's. It wasn't until 2013 that it went to 67.36jlv wrote:I think 67 aHr should be the baseline for 2011s and 2012s, but the site is still showing 62 aHr.kirkhilles wrote:Thanks for the input. Honestly, I'm not sure if there are any definite values for each year (be sure to let me know if you find any), so I just searched around and came up with those. I've adjusted the values to 67 as that also matches the value for the 2012 owner that looks like he's gotten a new battery.
Another suggestion: in the "Amp Hours over Time" you might want to filter the data to be just by month. The output is getting really long!