planet4ever
Well-known member
To earther: I sent you a PM, Steve.
Rat said:I agree SF is better than Santa Rosa or Sonoma, at least for those of us south of both, but I'm hoping that means the SF region, not just the city. It seems to me that down here in the heart of Silicon Valley (and maybe the Gilroy area too) are better spots to kick off because the flat terrain, higher incomes, warmer weather, and very receptive high-tech atmosphere here would be more conducive to a successful early experience with EVs than SF. SF is great for scenic vistas and tourist attractions but it's a horrible place to buy, drive, or park cars of any kind.
Maybe SF lawyers or doctors make more than Palo Alto lawyers or doctors, I don't know. I wouldn't bet on it; salaries and wages are high in both places. Percentage-wise SF has a lot more low-income people, though, and a much higher population of non-drivers. What I was driving at is that both in absolute numbers and in percentages, I believe Santa Clara County probably has a lot more people than SF who are willing and able economically to put out the higher initial cost for an EV, or who are subsidized by employers like Google, HP, Cisco, etc. as you say, and thus if I were an EV company, I would think Silicon Valley is a better target market for initial deployment for that and the other reasons I cited. I didn't mean to disparage SF or its residents.EVDRIVER said:Higher incomes over SF, that's funny. The entire bay area will be loaded with charging stations soon. If you work for google you may never have to pay to drive.
Rat said:Maybe SF lawyers or doctors make more than Palo Alto lawyers or doctors, I don't know. I wouldn't bet on it; salaries and wages are high in both places. Percentage-wise SF has a lot more low-income people, though, and a much higher population of non-drivers. What I was driving at is that both in absolute numbers and in percentages, I believe Santa Clara County probably has a lot more people than SF who are willing and able economically to put out the higher initial cost for an EV, or who are subsidized by employers like Google, HP, Cisco, etc. as you say, and thus if I were an EV company, I would think Silicon Valley is a better target market for initial deployment for that and the other reasons I cited. I didn't mean to disparage SF or its residents.EVDRIVER said:Higher incomes over SF, that's funny. The entire bay area will be loaded with charging stations soon. If you work for google you may never have to pay to drive.
Jimmydreams said:mwalsh said:Anyone going to see the Leaf over the next couple of days?
Sacramento tomorrow
Santa Rosa Monday
Santa Cruz Tuesday
Modesto Wednesday
http://www.amgentourofcalifornia.com/Route/stages.html
Could you report back on what you see/hear in the 'Leaf in California this next week' thread?
I might be able to make it up to Big Bear on Friday. I'm off work that day...I think I'll wait and see what others report before committing. If it's a mock-up that you cannot touch, I'll wait for a real test drive scenario.
garygid said:Guipo,
Ask them if they would open a rear side door and fold the rear seat down.
Look forward to any pictures you get.
garygid said:Guipo,
Ask them if they would open a rear side door and fold the rear seat down.
Look forward to any pictures you get.
garygid said:I can understand that they might not be allowed to touch anything, and even the possibility that the car's insides are not even (fully) functional.
But, you can ask if they know how it folds down.
But, perhaps even they have never seen a LEAF that works.
garygid said:TOUCH? Wow!
The under-body clearance looks quite reasonable.
Enter your email address to join: