Jimmydreams
Well-known member
I think it's interesting (and sad) that it costs more to 'deliver' the energey than it does to make it. Why not simplify things with one simple charge what includes delivery?? :?:
CA utilities can only profit on the distribution costs - the cost of the infrastructure they build/maintain to deliver the energy. I believe that's why it's broken out like that...Jimmydreams said:I think it's interesting (and sad) that it costs more to 'deliver' the energey than it does to make it. Why not simplify things with one simple charge what includes delivery?? :?:
Contact Matt Zerega area code 858............6.5.4.8.3.7.4stanley said:I received a call on Monday March 7 from SDG&E asking whether I want a second meter and about scheduling them to come out to my home to see where they would put it.. I have not heard from them since. Does any one have a telephone number so that I can call them directly?
It depends how you define "install". My understanding is that Ecotality's contractor does the work, but SDG&E is kicking in the money. Also, the new meter is behind the existing service meter, so I don't think it's any different to do than a subpanel...SDG&E would just need to insert the new meter.garygid said:I believe that SDG&E just "inserts" the new meter (some call it "install the meter") in the circular opening of the meter-mount (and ring) box that "you" (or your agents) have installed, wired, and gotten inspected.
So, SDG&E does not really "install" any wiring beyond their three very heavy-gauge, service feed-in wires ... I believe.
Canceled but then brought back again according the the SDG&E rep who phoned to ask me whether I wanted a (free) second meter. Probably the data the EV Project gets from those unfortunate enough to draw the -L rate is that they will charge immediately when they get home from work, during one of the peak demand periods for the grid. And that, at least, should be enough to doom the -L rate as the rate to be offered to everyone.garygid said:I believe the "low" (-L) was cancelled.
I think you have to take whatever they randomly assign you. But then it's your choice whether to charge at night on L2 like they hope drivers will do, or charge at 6pm when they hope drivers will not charge - since the rate isn't much different. It's also your choice whether to skip the separately metered L2 and do most of your charging with L1 on your house meter. That could make sense if you're still within the baseline rate tier. It would make a lot of sense if you have a PV surplus since they will probably buy the surplus back at wholesale rates, probably about a nickel a kWh, so that's effectively your cost to charge. Since they are going to study the L-rate I hope the findings of their study will be that it doesn't work and should never be considered for a permanent rate.garygid said:Can one refuse to take the L-rate?
For super-off-peak charging, it IS SLIGHTLY less expensive, right?
Except it isn't "required". That's why they called Mr. Walterbays and asked him if he wanted the meter. Nice that they give the option so you can (try to) decide what works better for you.garygid said:But, the "required" separate e-fuel meter of the EVProject makes using PV-fuel hard to do.
Per JimmyD's statement in the referenced post, opting out of the 2nd meter means opting out of the TOU rates, too. At that point, they still get data from the Blink, apparently, on your charging habits, just not as effected by the TOU rates.garygid said:If you do not use a 2nd meter, is the whole house required to be on the "assigned" tariff?
lonndoggie said:Except it isn't "required". That's why they called Mr. Walterbays and asked him if he wanted the meter. Nice that they give the option so you can (try to) decide what works better for you.garygid said:But, the "required" separate e-fuel meter of the EVProject makes using PV-fuel hard to do.
Jimmydreams, who has the second meter and thus must qualify as an expert in the matter, said here that you can opt out later, even. And others in that thread indicated that the second meter was optional as well.
Absolutely! A definite clarification there. However, there is the crossover bit where the EVProject install is tied in with your decision to participate in the SDG&E rate study, as they prep the install so it can take a meter.Jimmydreams said:IIRC, there are really two different programs that people are confusing.
1) EVP: They provide and install a Blink unit and monitor your use/charging/etc.
2) SDG&E Experimental Rate Project/Program: SDG&E will install a second EV TOU meter, assign you an experimental rate, and use that data to help them screw....uh....I mean set standard EV TOU prices for everyone.
Clear as mud??
:mrgreen:
Right, and that information isn't as easy to find online (the CPUC paper I referenced was from last summer). But that is why they're contacting us in the EV Project and asking if we want to opt in.ENIAC said:I think the SDG&E study and the EV Project were tied together at one point. I suspect for regulatory reasons they needed to be unhooked. I received a call from SDG&E in December notifying me that I wasn't required to participate in their study to be part of the EV Project.
Enter your email address to join: