kaihripentiki
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2021
- Messages
- 13
(Sorry about image links, they wouldn't inline during preview)
Last friday, i was on a trip to visit some relatives across state and stopped at a quick charger to take on energy.
My 2023 Nissan LEAF SV+ was at 18% SOC (per LEAFSpy) w/ battery at ~14C (~57F). It was approximately -3C outside (Per LEAFSpy) and fairly windy.
I turned off the car, opened the charge door, connected the CHAdeMO connector to the vehicle, initiated charging, and verified that the car was taking on power via LEAFSpy.
Per LEAFSpy, the car had accepted 200Wh, the charger and LEAFSpy both indicated ~37kW charging rate, and still climbing. It had been perhaps 10 seconds.
I pressed the LEAF's power button (as i would normally) so i can run the environmental control to keep the cabin warm. Immediately, the charging stopped, and the screen on the charger indicated a charger fault.
I disconnected the charger, and contacted Shell Recharge/Greenlots. They reset the charger for me. This took approximately 5 minutes.
I then reconnected the charger, and attempted to initiate a charge, however at the point when the charger would normally start delivering power, the charger instead indicated that i needed to plug the charger in to begin.
Perplexed, i unplugged the car again, waited for the charger to indicate ready and made another attempt, with the same results: Plug the charger into the car to begin was displayed on the charger.
I unplugged the car again, and attempted to start the car. I was greeted with a bunch of lights on the days and an EV System Error message, informing me to seek service. (i forget the exact words). In attempting to start the car, i did not hear battery contactors as i was accustomed to, so i knew i was hosed.
I contacted Nissan via the SOS button and had the vehicle towed to my originating dealer.
While waiting for the tow to arrive, i used LEAFSpy to read the DTCs. This was taking quite some time, but later after the car arrived at the dealer, i saw that it had completed.
Here's the LEAFSpy output for DTCs.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/3ufHvfBd3jDXW4Sj6
The dealer had the car from Friday until this morning (the next Tuesday). They called me near the end of shift last night (16:00) to tell me they reset the codes and performed diagnostic procedures and the car was now working fine with no identified failures. I picked the car up at opening this morning.
From reading the 2015 manual on nicoclub, my understanding is that P315C indicates that one or both of P31CA or P31CB has been thrown. Procedure for either P31CA or P31CB is to clear the codes, attempt a attempt a quick charge for 10 seconds or more, and then see if the code is thrown again. If the code is throw, clear the code and repeat the process. If the code is thrown again, diagnose PDM and/or VCM and/or wiring. (paraphrased)
The documentation provided by the dealership regarding U1009 indicates this is essentially the same as the procedure indicated for u1008/1008A in the 2015 manual, and essentially the same procedure as above.
So, i expected when i got my car back from the dealership, that it would have +2 QC events logged in the ECU. However, instead i found +3 L1/L2 events.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Hg7RD6wjmFNAc6NT8
My first question then, should i consider LEAFSpy's report of QC and L1/L2 events reliable (i always have before) and assume that this means the dealership didn't actually perform the diagnostic procedure prescribed, and thus did little more than reset the codes and charge my car for me over L2?
My other question involves the notes left by the dealership on the service invoice (which was for $0 under warranty) Emphasis mine:
A - Customer states he was charging vehicle at charging station, and now car will not start, diag
Cause: NODJQX
NODJQX NO DEFECT FOUND
12 W hrs.
FC: 98
PART #: 296B15SA1B
COUNT: 1
CLAIM TYPE: PO
AUTH CODE:
Parts: 0.0 Labor: 0.0 Other: 0.0 Total 0.0
,,5736
,,Confirmed customers concern had 4 codes P315C-71, P31CA-71, P31CB-71, and U1009-96
,,The first code said to diag next two codes first. those codes said to diag the u1009-96. can cause other codes to come on.
,,Performed diag. Used quick charge and did not happen again. Customer note said try to turn on car while on charger.
,,You are not supposed to do that; can cause fail safe mode. Not supposed to be in car when using quick charge station.
,,U1009-06 can also come on. When quick chrager error signal is received from quick charger. When the time out error of quick charger is detected
B - Parked on east side of building
12 ISP hrs.
Parts: 0.0 Labor: 0.0 other: 0.0 total: 0.0
So first, it appears that my dealer thinks an L2 is a quick charge, which is troubling on it's own.
But more importantly, has anyone else ever been told you aren't supposed to attempt to put the car into "ON" mode while on the charger or that you aren't supposed to be in it while it's charging? CH-4 of the owners manual seems to directly contradict this. I asked the tech to provide documentation for this and he said he had none, only that is what they were told during training.
When i dropped my car off, my sales person also dropped another gem on me. "These cars aren't intended for long distance travel, they're really just for running around town." Anyone heard that one either?
Last friday, i was on a trip to visit some relatives across state and stopped at a quick charger to take on energy.
My 2023 Nissan LEAF SV+ was at 18% SOC (per LEAFSpy) w/ battery at ~14C (~57F). It was approximately -3C outside (Per LEAFSpy) and fairly windy.
I turned off the car, opened the charge door, connected the CHAdeMO connector to the vehicle, initiated charging, and verified that the car was taking on power via LEAFSpy.
Per LEAFSpy, the car had accepted 200Wh, the charger and LEAFSpy both indicated ~37kW charging rate, and still climbing. It had been perhaps 10 seconds.
I pressed the LEAF's power button (as i would normally) so i can run the environmental control to keep the cabin warm. Immediately, the charging stopped, and the screen on the charger indicated a charger fault.
I disconnected the charger, and contacted Shell Recharge/Greenlots. They reset the charger for me. This took approximately 5 minutes.
I then reconnected the charger, and attempted to initiate a charge, however at the point when the charger would normally start delivering power, the charger instead indicated that i needed to plug the charger in to begin.
Perplexed, i unplugged the car again, waited for the charger to indicate ready and made another attempt, with the same results: Plug the charger into the car to begin was displayed on the charger.
I unplugged the car again, and attempted to start the car. I was greeted with a bunch of lights on the days and an EV System Error message, informing me to seek service. (i forget the exact words). In attempting to start the car, i did not hear battery contactors as i was accustomed to, so i knew i was hosed.
I contacted Nissan via the SOS button and had the vehicle towed to my originating dealer.
While waiting for the tow to arrive, i used LEAFSpy to read the DTCs. This was taking quite some time, but later after the car arrived at the dealer, i saw that it had completed.
Here's the LEAFSpy output for DTCs.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/3ufHvfBd3jDXW4Sj6
The dealer had the car from Friday until this morning (the next Tuesday). They called me near the end of shift last night (16:00) to tell me they reset the codes and performed diagnostic procedures and the car was now working fine with no identified failures. I picked the car up at opening this morning.
From reading the 2015 manual on nicoclub, my understanding is that P315C indicates that one or both of P31CA or P31CB has been thrown. Procedure for either P31CA or P31CB is to clear the codes, attempt a attempt a quick charge for 10 seconds or more, and then see if the code is thrown again. If the code is throw, clear the code and repeat the process. If the code is thrown again, diagnose PDM and/or VCM and/or wiring. (paraphrased)
The documentation provided by the dealership regarding U1009 indicates this is essentially the same as the procedure indicated for u1008/1008A in the 2015 manual, and essentially the same procedure as above.
So, i expected when i got my car back from the dealership, that it would have +2 QC events logged in the ECU. However, instead i found +3 L1/L2 events.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Hg7RD6wjmFNAc6NT8
My first question then, should i consider LEAFSpy's report of QC and L1/L2 events reliable (i always have before) and assume that this means the dealership didn't actually perform the diagnostic procedure prescribed, and thus did little more than reset the codes and charge my car for me over L2?
My other question involves the notes left by the dealership on the service invoice (which was for $0 under warranty) Emphasis mine:
A - Customer states he was charging vehicle at charging station, and now car will not start, diag
Cause: NODJQX
NODJQX NO DEFECT FOUND
12 W hrs.
FC: 98
PART #: 296B15SA1B
COUNT: 1
CLAIM TYPE: PO
AUTH CODE:
Parts: 0.0 Labor: 0.0 Other: 0.0 Total 0.0
,,5736
,,Confirmed customers concern had 4 codes P315C-71, P31CA-71, P31CB-71, and U1009-96
,,The first code said to diag next two codes first. those codes said to diag the u1009-96. can cause other codes to come on.
,,Performed diag. Used quick charge and did not happen again. Customer note said try to turn on car while on charger.
,,You are not supposed to do that; can cause fail safe mode. Not supposed to be in car when using quick charge station.
,,U1009-06 can also come on. When quick chrager error signal is received from quick charger. When the time out error of quick charger is detected
B - Parked on east side of building
12 ISP hrs.
Parts: 0.0 Labor: 0.0 other: 0.0 total: 0.0
So first, it appears that my dealer thinks an L2 is a quick charge, which is troubling on it's own.
But more importantly, has anyone else ever been told you aren't supposed to attempt to put the car into "ON" mode while on the charger or that you aren't supposed to be in it while it's charging? CH-4 of the owners manual seems to directly contradict this. I asked the tech to provide documentation for this and he said he had none, only that is what they were told during training.
When i dropped my car off, my sales person also dropped another gem on me. "These cars aren't intended for long distance travel, they're really just for running around town." Anyone heard that one either?