TaylorSFGuy
Well-known member
I see consistently lower range from the third bar used than all the others. Does this correspond to a physical part of the battery?
That's weird. Third bar from the top or the bottom on the SOC gauge? Bars seem to be fairly fluid and shouldn't correspond to a particular battery range. The consensus seems to be that the car is using coulomb counting, open-current voltage and other parameters to estimate the state of charge. Did you have a software update applied to your car recently? Any perceived change to the available motor power?TaylorSFGuy said:I see consistently lower range from the third bar used than all the others. Does this correspond to a physical part of the battery?
surfingslovak said:That's weird. Third bar from the top or the bottom on the SOC gauge? Bars seem to be fairly fluid and shouldn't correspond to a particular battery range. The consensus seems to be that the car is using coulomb counting, open-current voltage and other parameters to estimate the state of charge. Did you have a software update applied to your car recently? Any perceived change to the available motor power?TaylorSFGuy said:I see consistently lower range from the third bar used than all the others. Does this correspond to a physical part of the battery?
TaylorSFGuy said:I see consistently lower range from the third bar used than all the others. Does this correspond to a physical part of the battery?
DaveinOlyWA said:i spent a lot of time early in the game trying to gauge a pattern of "disapperance" of the bars and gave up simply because they were so variant. i pretty much ignore them now.
to be honest with ya, i jump in the car that morning knowing how far i have to go, check the gauge if i have not charged to 100% the night before to make sure i have enough and that is pretty much the last time i look at the bars (having GID meter really helps a lot!)
speaking of which; how many miles u up to and did you ever get a chance to check your SOC?
Impressive recordkeeping! While the data does suggest some capacity loss, I don't think that there is a clear pattern, which shows less range for a particular bar. Am I looking right? That said, we now know that the bars are fluid and they get remapped as the available capacity shrinks. It looks like the bars are derived the current Gid count, which in turn is based on a Coulomb count and adjusted by looking at the pack voltage when the car is not running. Although not perfect, we would not expect this relationship and the discharge curve of the battery to change much over time. Can you explain the effect you observed again? Did you have a chance to record the pack voltage after a full charge last time you had access to the Gid meter? If not, it might be beneficial to do that now.TaylorSFGuy said:I've tried 3 different routes. For me it began quite consistently - I used to take my Miles/kwh x 1.5 and multiplied by number of bars expecting it to drop off at that point. They fell off pretty consistently - at 10 bars gone, I expected 66 miles with 4.4 miles/kwh.
I will be through 50,000 miles on Friday and will do the SOC testing this weekend or early next week.
8/28 In Average Total Miles Expected Miles % of Expected
Bar 1 4.5 6.5 6.8 96.3%
Bar 2 5.0 14.0 15.0 93.3%
Bar 3 4.7 18.5 21.2 87.3%
Bar 4 4.4 22.4 26.4 84.8%
Bar 5 4.6 29.1 34.5 84.3%
Bar 6 4.5 34.7 40.5 85.7%
Bar 7 4.7 42.9 49.4 86.8%
Bar 8 4.7 48.7 56.4 86.3%
Bar 9 4.6 53.9 62.1 86.8%
Bar 10 4.6 59.4 69.0 86.1%
End 4.5 63.3
8/29 Out
Bar 1 3.8 4.6 5.7 80.7%
Bar 2 3.9 11.0 11.7 94.0%
Bar 3 4.1 15.5 18.5 83.8%
Bar 4 4.1 20.8 24.6 84.6%
Bar 5 4.2 27.4 31.5 87.0%
Bar 6 4.3 33.5 38.7 86.6%
Bar 7 4.3 39.7 45.2 87.8%
Bar 8 4.5 47.0 54.0 87.0%
Bar 9 4.3 51.6 58.1 88.8%
Bar 10 4.4 58.4 66.0 88.5%
End
8/30 In - Puyallup
Bar 1 4.6 6.4 6.9 92.8%
Bar 2 4.7 13.8 14.1 97.9%
Bar 3 4.7 18.4 21.2 86.8%
Bar 4 4.2 21.7 25.2 86.1%
Bar 5 4.3 27.6 32.3 85.4%
Bar 6 4.4 33.9 39.6 85.6%
Bar 7 4.6 42.3 48.3 87.6%
Bar 8 4.5 47.2 54.0 87.4%
Bar 9 4.5 52.6 60.8 86.5%
Bar 10 4.4 58.7 66.0 88.9%
Bar 11 4.4 65.6 72.6 90.4%
surfingslovak said:Did you have a chance to record the pack voltage after a full charge last time you had access to the Gid meter? If not, it might be beneficial to do that now.
FairwoodRed said:surfingslovak said:Did you have a chance to record the pack voltage after a full charge last time you had access to the Gid meter? If not, it might be beneficial to do that now.
I've never seen an option for checking pack voltage with my GID meter. Is it possible that not all GID meters have that option? If my GID meter had it, could you describe how to find it / use it / take a reading?
FairwoodRed said:surfingslovak said:Did you have a chance to record the pack voltage after a full charge last time you had access to the Gid meter? If not, it might be beneficial to do that now.
I've never seen an option for checking pack voltage with my GID meter. Is it possible that not all GID meters have that option? If my GID meter had it, could you describe how to find it / use it / take a reading?
91040 said:Dave, isn't it the opposite?
Red button toggles between Gid/percentage mode and the Amps/Voltage/power mode.
Black button toggles within each mode.
FairwoodRed said:surfingslovak said:Did you have a chance to record the pack voltage after a full charge last time you had access to the Gid meter? If not, it might be beneficial to do that now.
I've never seen an option for checking pack voltage with my GID meter. Is it possible that not all GID meters have that option? If my GID meter had it, could you describe how to find it / use it / take a reading?
FairwoodRed said:Good to know! For some reason I had it in my mind that the buttons were for "future development". What I remember about the switches is that "they both should be down". I should have read the manual better.
My meter is with TaylorSFguy for a while, but I'll test it after. Unless TaylorSFguy wants to play with it for me...
Enter your email address to join: