Berlino
Well-known member
GRA said:Which is why I mentioned that Tesla owners can afford more choice in their living arrangements, including choosing to live in locations which will install or allow to be installed L2 EVSEs.
The Condo market is in free-fall where I live, so it doesn't make sense to buy now.
GRA said:Model S/X owners are a desirable demographic, so don't you think property owners will accomodate them?
I am a Model S owner, but some properties I've approached consider being EV friendly more trouble than it's worth. Again, I don't live in California where EVs are common.
A local Auto columnist had been renting the same property in an upscale Condo community in Florida for years. Well, this year he got his hands on an ELR to review. After getting the Superintendents permission, he plugged the ELR into a 120 volt outlet in the garage. Soon after, he got notice of a "violation," and was called before Owner's association where they flatly denied him the option of plugging in the ELR. This even after he offered to well overpay the cost of the electricity. To top it off, they've put him on an "undesirable" list and refused him future leases at the property. This is far from the only case of undue hostility towards plug-in drivers in Florida.
GRA said:Of course, for those that won't and the potential Tesla owner doesn't have the option of moving, a Tesla (or other BEV) is a poor choice. An ICE/HEV or maybe an FCEV eventually makes more sense for them.
It can be inconvenient for me to recharge, but I'd rather die than drive an ICE. Some people wouldn't want to live with the inconvenience, I understand. However, when you have a Supercharger in town there's little or no trouble refueling when compared to visiting gas stations. I don't see how you can make a blanket statement about an EV being a poor choice without access to home charging.
It makes a lot of sense to get people off ICE in cities. (Mass transit may be better option than EVs, but that's another story).