Stoaty
Well-known member
A link to the Google Drive version of the spreadsheet has been added to the Wiki. Reg, feel free to modify the Wiki text if it is inaccurate in any way.
I could do that, but I would prefer to allow people to make comparisons with their 2013 LEAFs to see if the predictions are accurate.stjohnh said:That's exactly what I was going to recommend, maybe also limit the validation for date of manufacture to 2011 and 2012 Leafs.
Please post capacity results to this thread only if you have had the P3227 update done at least 6 weeks earlier. Without the update, the "actual" capacity is not a meaningful number for tuning the battery aging model.ranss12 said:Just got my LEAFDD today - had to try it out... here are my results - quite a bit better than I thought they might be. Must be the cool temps here just south of Rochester, NY
--Date of P3227 update needed, but not yet done. I don't know if/when I will have it done.
opencar said:finally hit 6 wks from my update:
Manufactured - 3/11
Delivered - 6/3/11
P3227 update - 9/6/13
Location - San Diego, CA
Miles/kwh - ~4.2
Odometer - 24,440mi
Capacity - 54.79
Date - 10/18/13
Parked in sun - 5 days/week
Garage - Unventilated & uninsulated
Capacity bars indicated - 11
DC Charge Count - 17
AC Charge Count - 1613
Sorry about the loss of a bar.JeremyW said:December Update:
Just lost the first capacity bar....
Riverside or Van Nuys are probably better matches for Pasadena climate.RegGuheert said:I put your data into Stoaty's online calculator:
Actual loss: 16.42
Predicted loss (Sacramento): 13.67
Predicted loss (Anaheim): 14.81
So it looks like your actual loss is 10% higher than predicted for Anaheim and 20% higher than predicted for Sacramento.
RegGuheert said:So it looks like your actual loss is 10% higher than predicted for Anaheim and 20% higher than predicted for Sacramento. (Sorry, I'm having a hard time remembering where Pasadena is just now. If it is not close to Anaheim, my apologies!).
surfingslovak said:RegGuheert said:So it looks like your actual loss is 10% higher than predicted for Anaheim and 20% higher than predicted for Sacramento. (Sorry, I'm having a hard time remembering where Pasadena is just now. If it is not close to Anaheim, my apologies!).
The battery in Jeremy's LEAF could be a good litmus test for heavy quick charger use.
Thanks! Those are a bit closer, but the time in Folsom would tend to lower the overall.Stoaty said:Riverside or Van Nuys are probably better matches for Pasadena climate.RegGuheert said:I put your data into Stoaty's online calculator:
Actual loss: 16.42
Predicted loss (Sacramento): 13.67
Predicted loss (Anaheim): 14.81
So it looks like your actual loss is 10% higher than predicted for Anaheim and 20% higher than predicted for Sacramento.
YOUR new car, Dave?DaveinOlyWA said:ok, here is new data for new car
Ya. I tried to charge it last night but it stopped at 80% so by the time I browsed the settings and restarted the charge I did not have enough time to complete the charge but did make.it to 97.3% and 284 GIDs. The GOM is much improved giving me an estimate of 93 miles. Will be a few days before I Can do any real driving in it but will say after a few hours that the heated seats and steering wheel makes a HUGE differenceRegGuheert said:YOUR new car, Dave?DaveinOlyWA said:ok, here is new data for new car
I find it interesting that the average cell voltage is shown as 4.110V. I have never seen our LEAF above 4.100V.
Enter your email address to join: