garygid said:
Of course, the charger would cost more.
As an option to replace the 3.3 kW (8-hour) charger, how much would you pay (assuming you actually wanted it) for these?
1. a 6.6 kW (4-hour) 240v charger
2. a 12 kW (2-hour) 240v charger.
Ah, Gary, I think you really are on to something: http://ualstore.co.uk/catalogsearch/result/?q=A412232-HV&x=0&y=0
It seems to me, what we're really talking about is to build in Rectifier that turns the AC into DC and charges the battery using Direct Current. There may be some transformer to step the current up or down as allowed by the battery charge limits and thus allow the fabled 2.5 hour charge!
Now, that unit up there is based on single-pole 240V circuits as are used in the U.K. (and, IIRC, Japan) where as in the U.S. our 240V circuits are usually dual-phase (hot-hot) circuits, so we couldn't use exactly that unit. But, it's small and could certainly fit in the car and at £260.00, or about $400, this wouldn't be all that pricey even if installation was made it twice that. I mean, really, under a grand for 2.5 hour charging, who wouldn't want that??
That said, remember how Quick Charging more than once a day is said to severely degrade your battery's capacity and shorten it's life. Mark Parry (again, IIRC) on Science Friday stated that 6.6kW charging would not degrade the battery life. I wonder if 12kW charging would, and if so by how much. Still, if it could be installed and did not limit the battery capacity then I'm easily in for the cool G!
For 6.6kW, I'd probably still pay a G for it, but in this case I'd have to say if I'd pay the same for the 12kW, I'd consider the 6.6kW at $1000 a ripoff. Instead, I'd consider it reasonable at $700 or so, if not less.
As for using something besides the J1772 port to provide the 240V @ 50A current, I'd say no. J1772 is for L2 and 240V 50A is still technically L2 since it uses AC. Keep the Quick Charge / DC for L3 with it's specific connector; L2 should remain AC with the built-in Rectifier.