EatsShootsandLeafs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2012
- Messages
- 716
It essentially has; you can infer the standard based on what the premium gives.TSLA has not announced, how cheap the interior of the $36.2K Model 3 will be, or what other features it will be lacking, in comparison to the small number of ~$50k to ~$60.5k Model 3s it has actually built and given glimpses of so far.
As for the leaf costing about half a model 3, this is also half true. So far the model 3s being sold (the thirty that have) are pricing out at $59k, but it's not fair to compare a gen 2 basic leaf to a tricked out M3 and at the same time say the leaf offers more utility, as you did. That jacked up model 3 will have approx twice the range for one thing, plus an ever-increasing suite of enhanced auto-pilot, and access to a super charger network. The fair comparison is the $35k model 3. It's not available yet but looks like it will be next year. At that point you'll have a car massively quicker than the Gen 2 leaf, with much better range, a better history of keeping range over time (battery), and a car that is likely to get better over time via updates (can we say the same about the gen 2leaf?).
Yes tesla has a poor history of quality relatively speaking, and there isn't a tesla dealer on each corner like there is a nissan. There are definite benefits to having a nissan sticker on the car, but my guess is the day you drive each car off the lot your grin will be a lot bigger behind the wheel of the tesla. And that's why it costs more, and it's going to sell better, too.
Call it self-esteem issues (I prefer wisdom, but who knows), but picture the month is December 2018 and two guys pull up to the lights, one in a model 3 another in a gen 2. Which guy is trying to rationalize in his head his purchase choice? I doubt it's the guy who's range meter is saying 189 miles left and when the light goes green he's about to obliterate the other one.