I had a conference call today at 4pm with Tom Jacobson, Ecotality Director of Sales, and Andy Hoskinson, San Diego Area Manager. The call lasted 49 minutes. I was physically parked in front of the 3 Blinks at Reuben H. Fleet, and plugged in to charge on the middle unit. I found that my "free" Blink card did not work that I received in exactly the same spot last June at the mayor's inauguration of these units.
I used the Blink card that was mailed to me, and it now asks for your zip code. A silver LEAF was plugged in the left stall, and a Car2go Smart EV arrived, so I switched to the right handicapped Blink, and plugged in the Smart, activating both with my card (all the while on the phone). All three were now charging, even though only two showed online with the Blink app.
Tom started out by saying, "We're not happy with the product", which I think put us on a good track of discussing the issues, instead of me complaining and they defending their "honor" and product.
Andy discussed the new hardware that they installed at Balboa. They outright replaced four units (but as you can see in the above post, 3 different ones are failed). They installed new RFID card readers, and tomorrow (Thursday) they will install commercial firmware version 1.5 which will work with the new RFID readers.
One advantage of this is that the Blink will now ping "home" more often, so you won't have to call when they go down (that's the theory, at least). I suggested putting simple numbers on the units in plain site, so that they can be easily identified. Perhaps "FLEET 1", "FLEET 2", and "FLEET 3", and "PALISADES 1,2,3,4,5,6,7" at the Auto Museum. Perhaps the Blink Network phone number, too.
I asked how long a unit can be expected to be down after it becomes known to be failed? First, Tom said a 24 hour turn around, and suggested that a big failure, for instance if all 7 at Palisades went Tango Uniform, they'd want to get right on it.
I told them I had called one of their contractors, Baker Electric, to ask what their status was in fixing these, and they said that they didn't have one anymore. So it seemed like they are going backwards on maintenance. Andy said that they had doubled their field service staff (he didn't specify if that meant going from one to two, or something else). Tom mentioned how expensive a contractor like Baker is, and in an area like San Diego, with 1500 units, it made sense to have a dedicated staff for maintenance. But, in an area like Colorado, with 300 units spread out over a larger area, it was probably more wise to have contractors. Tom did mention that, reference the service issue, "We don't know what the best way is. We're still figuring it out." Fair enough.
I mentioned how I had to find out about new charging installations in San Diego by word of mouth. It would be nice if we could be actively notified of new locations (by region, for example, we don't want Phoenix data). They could spare us the "publically traded company" stuff that takes up two thirds of the announcement. Yes, of course they show up passively on their website, which is great.
Andy closed with highlighting an underlying theme; lack of communication. He acknowledged that they need to enhance the Blinks to build confidence in them. Yes, that will take a while.
Edit: Andy stated that the Balboa Park installations were not paid for with City of San Diego tax dollars. Installations are matched dollar for dollar by DOE money. My commentary, somewhat jaded by decades of working for the US government, and a brother who did buying for the US government, is that if I sell you a product for $2 that cost me $1 to produce, did it really cost me anything in a 50/50 price match?Of course, they have to pencil in profit, and I'm confident they do.