You do want to have some skepticism when looking up “CATL” branded batteries. Mike made a good observation.
We’ll use Starmax as an example (a company even I’ve thought about purchasing from), has several listings, some say HY-CATL, some say CATL only, some say LiFePO4, but what they all have in common is that their battery manufacturer sheet say they are HY-TAFEL batteries, a competitor of CATL.
Take another one for example CALB another competitor of CATL who has recently lost a lawsuit for patent infringement. More flags are raised when you look more into it. They infringed on 5 patents, one of which is for “Explosion-Proof Device (CN205231128U)”
As stated in this article:
https://www.wispro.com/en/catl-and-...nt-offenses-and-defense-war-tend-to-be-harsh/
I personally don’t know what a company like CALB could do to further cut corners on something like “Explosion-Proof Device” but I don’t want to be on the receiving end of that to find out.
Point is, a lot of the Chinese sales strategy is have lots of variety and see what sticks, just look at temu & shein. Alibaba is no saint in this strategy either. They primarily prey on people’s ignorance and that’s unethical no mater how ethical they want to convince you they are. Not speaking on every Chinese company. CATL clearly has done it right, proven multiple times. However, CATL is not a generic term for Chinese batteries but the uneducated public searches for them like they are. Then the sneaky distributors who receive random grade batteries from several manufacturers slap a CATL QR code and suddenly people believe they’re genuine CATL when they are not. That’s also to say that companies like Starmax (from my example earlier) who do in house spot welding, could be mixing manufacturers or worse, battery chemistries due to their lack of knowledge. EVE Batteries are 304Ah cells and CATL Batteries are 302Ah cells etc etc…
Too many variables to mess with.